This is Google's cache of http://www.leog.net/fujp_forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=12615&whichpage=4. It is a snapshot of the page as it appeared on Jun 22, 2010 07:10:29 GMT. The current page could have changed in the meantime. Learn more

Text-only version
These search terms are highlighted: netbooks have arrived  
LeoG.net Ultra-Portables Forum - Netbooks have arrived
LeoG.net Ultra-Portables Forum
LeoG.net Ultra-Portables Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
 All Forums
 Other Sub-Notebooks
 GENERAL Sub-Notebook Topics
 Netbooks have arrived
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Previous Page | Next Page
Author  Topic Next Topic
Page: of 14

nomo
Average Member

812 Posts

Posted - 12/18/2008 :  19:35:30  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by oion

I was just thinking it would be hilarious if ... 4) the classic subnotebook is reinvented through repeat evolution, perhaps at a lower base price point compared to the last evolution.
I'm hoping Fujitsu jumps to #4 and introduces a mid-level 9-10" machine at about 2/3 the price of a P1630.

BTW, I'm pretty happy with the growth of netbooks even if I don't plan to purchase one. First, the increasing popularity of small computers will eventually lead to better selection in the sub-notebook category (as the previous post describes). Second, perhaps the industry may finally be maturing and device makers will start addressing some long term legacy issues.

Edited by - nomo on 12/18/2008 19:42:49
Go to Top of Page

oion
Advanced Member

USA
2231 Posts

Posted - 12/26/2008 :  21:06:44  Show Profile  Visit oion's Homepage  Reply with Quote
Speaking about that profit margin...
Tech's hope in 2009 - or curse? (12/24/08)
quote:

Tech Daily: Sales of under-$400 computers are expected to soar in the coming year - much to the delight of one tech giant and the dismay of just about everyone else.

Fun times, folks, fun times. It's always enjoyable to watch technology evolve like this with no idea where it's heading. After all, netbooks were intended to only be a supplement to desktops and other laptops, not a full-on replacement.

I suppose it's no surprise that it was Intel that coined the term.
Go to Top of Page

NigelS
Senior Member Member

Canada
1339 Posts

Posted - 01/06/2009 :  23:42:22  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Some news nuggets - Windows 7 Beta is benching faster than XP and Vista - should be great for everyone but especially for netbooks. Sony's netbook debut will have a 1600×768 resolution and get this: it's called the P-Series. HP has already done this and get this: it's called the 2140 (love those vintage Lifebook identifiers).
http://news.techcastnetwork.co.uk/2008/12/29/windows-7-build-7000/
http://jkontherun.com/2008/12/25/sonys-netbook-fits-in-a-pocket-might-not-fit-netbook-category/
http://ces.cnet.com/8301-19167_1-10131241-100.html
Go to Top of Page

oion
Advanced Member

USA
2231 Posts

Posted - 01/07/2009 :  12:19:14  Show Profile  Visit oion's Homepage  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by NigelS

Some news nuggets - Windows 7 Beta is benching faster than XP and Vista - should be great for everyone but especially for netbooks.



Yes, but what's the interface like and how backwards compatible is it on top of expected bloat? That's all I want to know. The worst-case scenario is that, for a theoretical future computer purchase I cannot yet afford, I'd have to dual-boot. I still laugh at the general failure of Vista, though. Excuse me--ha ha ha ha ha.

quote:

Sony's netbook debut will have a 1600×768 resolution and get this: it's called the P-Series. HP has already done this and get this: it's called the 2140 (love those vintage Lifebook identifiers).



This is all sorts of wrong. Seriously, what the hell? Can't these giants think of better series names for their trinkets, or is this an overt attempt to erase competition in our beloved subnotebook niche? Honestly. And if the Sony netbook screen size is still around the 10-inch mark, 1600 resolution will be completely illegible. What I find amusing is that even at current netbook defaults, people would normally need to tweak all their settings to make the display bigger. Hmmmm. These are all legitimate usability issues, but it seems technology design goes for the cool factor before functionality factor in many cases. I'm still waiting for that 17-inch folding LCD in a 3-lb subnote package.

Here's something to chew on for the more philosophical of us: When is a netbook no longer a netbook? Well, it's just an Intel marketing term, folks.

Here's another question for that burgeoning young-people-with-entitlement-issues segment: Do laptops and cell phones and other electronic gadgets actually increase student productivity and learning? Especially with internet access (netbooks ho!), I'd argue "absolutely not" since I've seen collegiate students in action with their hands on computers in the classrooms. Of course, research is still being done in that area, but I digress.

Still watching.

Edited by - oion on 01/07/2009 12:20:12
Go to Top of Page

nomo
Average Member

812 Posts

Posted - 01/07/2009 :  13:49:32  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by oion

And if the Sony netbook screen size is still around the 10-inch mark, 1600 resolution will be completely illegible.
This is, afterall, the same company that created the headache-inducing 1024x600 4.5" display on the UX-series UMPC. The Sony screen is reported to be around 8", which translates to about 7.2" x 3.5" with 0.11mm dot pitch. By comparison the Fujuitsu P16-series 8.9" display is about 0.15mm/pixel.
Go to Top of Page

oion
Advanced Member

USA
2231 Posts

Posted - 01/07/2009 :  14:38:53  Show Profile  Visit oion's Homepage  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by nomo

quote:
Originally posted by oion

And if the Sony netbook screen size is still around the 10-inch mark, 1600 resolution will be completely illegible.
This is, afterall, the same company that created the headache-inducing 1024x600 4.5" display on the UX-series UMPC. The Sony screen is reported to be around 8", which translates to about 7.2" x 3.5" with 0.11mm dot pitch. By comparison the Fujuitsu P16-series 8.9" display is about 0.15mm/pixel.



I'm convinced the Sony marketers+engineers do not actually use these things. 1600 resolution at EIGHT inches? What's the point of a "technological improvement" if people can't actually use the technology to its full capacity without some major setting hacks? (That's a rhetorical question...)

And if more younger people end up using these, I wonder how much damage they'll accumulate from eye strain. Certainly older folks who already have trouble with tiny print wouldn't be able to use these at all.

Curiously, while I wouldn't foresee netbooks falling to the 800x600 resolution, 1024 is still doable, you know. These manufacturers are acting like lower resolutions are shamefully backwards--no, it's dependent on screen size and usability first, dammit. Not that I'd buy one anyway. And I believe 1024 is still the most common overall resolution in the world right now anyway.

1024 at 8 inches is probably still pretty tight, though. (Anyone have a netbook and a ruler to measure standard on-screen font sizes in MS Word or something? LOL)
Go to Top of Page

tmt
Advanced Member

2763 Posts

Posted - 01/07/2009 :  14:42:44  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by NigelS

Sony's netbook debut will have a 1600×768 resolution

No way. That's a ridiculous aspect ratio and at the resulting 177dpi the 10" diagonal
screen would be 9"wx4.33"h. The photo alone disproves that, let alone the presence of
a touchpad.

I bet (assuming it exists at all) that it's 1366x768, a very Sony-typical HDTV aspect.
That would make the glass closer to 8.75"wx5"h (156dpi, still quite high).

What I want to know is, if Sony is getting into netbooks, where will they find the
margin to load them up with all their Sony "value add", i.e soak-the-consumer? Make
it up on batteries and other peripherals? I don't think so.

Tom.
Go to Top of Page

nomo
Average Member

812 Posts

Posted - 01/07/2009 :  15:35:04  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
The jkontherun article linked above suggests that the Sony device has an 8" display with a form factor similar to the HP Jornada. If so then the display height would be proportionately shorter than a conventional aspect ratio display.



FWIW, for me the optimal portable display is 10" with 1280x768 resolution -- pretty much like the Fujitsu P7-series.

Edited by - nomo on 01/07/2009 15:38:39
Go to Top of Page

oion
Advanced Member

USA
2231 Posts

Posted - 01/07/2009 :  17:02:49  Show Profile  Visit oion's Homepage  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by tmt

What I want to know is, if Sony is getting into netbooks, where will they find the
margin to load them up with all their Sony "value add", i.e soak-the-consumer? Make
it up on batteries and other peripherals? I don't think so.

Tom.



That's a good point. If "netbook" by definition means "cheap in all aspects," I don't possibly see how Sony, by definition "expensive and proprietary," can get an edge in profit margin when industry pundits have already been saying that vendors are losing because netbooks have such a small margin. Huh?

Nomo: The P-series 10.x-inch 1280 native resolution screens are good quality for me as well, but I still end up tweaking browser minimum font settings, Windows XP text size settings, and the video dpi resolution (to 120). I'm not that old, either, though my eyesight is meh.
Go to Top of Page

nomo
Average Member

812 Posts

Posted - 01/07/2009 :  19:39:49  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
From cnet asia:


There are more photos at engadget, but they look like computer generated models. Sony's launch is expected tomorrow.
Go to Top of Page

nomo
Average Member

812 Posts

Posted - 01/07/2009 :  21:10:57  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Released!


  • CPU: 1.33-GHz Z530 Intel Atom
  • Memory: 2GB RAM
  • Hard Drive: 60GB (standard), 64GB and 128GB SSD options
  • Display: 8 inches (1600 x 768 pixels)
  • Ports: 2 USB ports, headphone, included dongle adds connectivity for VGA, Ethernet, and additional USB
  • Slots: SD, MS
  • Size: 9.6 x 4.7 x 0.78 inches
  • Weight: 1.4 pounds
  • OS: Windows Vista
  • Price: $899 to $1,499
1.4-Pound Sony VAIO P Series Gets Official, Includes GPS and EV-DO (laptopmag)
Sony Vaio P unveiled- smaller than but not a netbook (jkontherun)
The Sony P-series Lifestyle PC: Just don't call it a Netbook (cnet)
Sony announces P Series Lifestyle PC, worlds lightest 8-inch notebook (gadgetell)

Edited by - nomo on 01/07/2009 21:11:59
Go to Top of Page

oion
Advanced Member

USA
2231 Posts

Posted - 01/07/2009 :  21:28:17  Show Profile  Visit oion's Homepage  Reply with Quote
Price: $899 to $1,499

Not a netbook.... IT'S A REMAKE OF THE PICTUREBOOK, HELLO.
Go to Top of Page

nomo
Average Member

812 Posts

Posted - 01/07/2009 :  21:31:44  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by oion

Not a netbook.... IT'S A REMAKE OF THE PICTUREBOOK, HELLO.
Actually, I think that's why it's called the "P-Series".

Info now available at sonystyle.com.

Edited by - nomo on 01/07/2009 21:33:07
Go to Top of Page

oion
Advanced Member

USA
2231 Posts

Posted - 01/07/2009 :  21:48:24  Show Profile  Visit oion's Homepage  Reply with Quote
Yes, I realized that after posting. But stop calling it the P-series, Sony. Honestly, it's annoying that people/vendors are making out netbooks as this totally new thing. They're the short-lived mininotebooks from the '90s made cheaper.


Well, I suppose the Sony VaoiP definitely isn't cheaper, though. The ol' Picturebook was 9-inch @ 1280x600. 8-inch @ 1600x768 is just...seriously stupid for something portable. What? However, the VGA-out is where the actual usage potential is, I suppose. If you use it as a portable hard drive with a screen for emergency use, it would remind me of the old Sharp Mebius with its dock. If you have decent screens at home and at work, all of this would be pretty nifty, I suppose. (Do the other "netbooks" have VGA-out? I can't be bothered to check, I guess.)

But overall, that new VaioP seems mind-bogglingly underwhelming for a "new" design when you take into account the target market (cheapness) and its price. And its lineage from the Picturebook... somehow, I find that very amusing.
Go to Top of Page

nomo
Average Member

812 Posts

Posted - 01/07/2009 :  22:11:36  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I expect it to be a niche product -- a "responsible" purchase for enthusiasts who would buy a $3k-$4k TT if the economy was better. If/when Sony eventually releases a dual core version it will be a good business companion.
Go to Top of Page

tmt
Advanced Member

2763 Posts

Posted - 01/07/2009 :  22:21:34  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Buy one fast if for some strange reason you like it. That thing is GONE and oughta be.

I know I've seen that thing before. Kind of a checkbook-sized chiclet keyboard calculator
circa 1980-something. Well hey this one has tons of memory. Just about as useful, though.
Ick.

Tom.
Go to Top of Page

NigelS
Senior Member Member

Canada
1339 Posts

Posted - 01/08/2009 :  01:54:14  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
My my don't we all enjoy looking down on everything when we're someplace 'up'... (Although it's fun to belong to a trend 5 years before everyone else though, I must say...;) In any case don't run down the Picturebook! It was Sony taking leadership and chances with Crusoe, which I admired them a great deal for. They sold a lot of those things, and it would have been my first computer if LeoG hadn't turned me towards the Light. As for the display exaggerations - the link explained the Sony 'ad' was just a roughdraft placeholder for the real deal. I like the up coming HP Mini 2140 options in that regard: 10.1-inch diagonal LED display with 16:9 aspect ratio available in either standard-definition (1,024 x 576) or high-definition (1,366 x 768) resolutions:
http://www.hp.com/hpinfo/newsroom/press/2009/090106xb.html
Go to Top of Page

mr1
Average Member

USA
724 Posts

Posted - 01/08/2009 :  02:49:57  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I see no VGA out port! Why Vista instead of XP?
The original Picturebook also turned me toward LeoG and Fujitsu.

MR1
5010D-60G HD,1GB RAM XPP
12/2005 P1510 30GB (Upgraded to 60GB HD)1GB Ram XPT BT Portreplicator
Go to Top of Page

tmt
Advanced Member

2763 Posts

Posted - 01/08/2009 :  07:21:34  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Heck with Windows altogether, somehow it doesn't make sense on this device. This isn't a
laptop at all. It's a special purpose device, for what special purpose I have no clue.

Tom.
Go to Top of Page

tmt
Advanced Member

2763 Posts

Posted - 01/08/2009 :  07:26:08  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Oh wait a sec. I know what they're doing.

quote:
The spacing between keys has also been engineered to help reduce typing mistakes making it perfect for long fingernails.


It's Sony's answer to the iPhone, without the phone of course, somehow thinking that women
want a windows laptop instead but don't want to carry it. Uh huh.

Tom.
Go to Top of Page

NigelS
Senior Member Member

Canada
1339 Posts

Posted - 01/08/2009 :  09:59:59  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Hmmm.... I've been meaning to grow my fingernails, too. This is fate!
Go to Top of Page

nomo
Average Member

812 Posts

Posted - 01/08/2009 :  10:34:35  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by mr1

I see no VGA out port! Why Vista instead of XP?
It comes with a display/LAN adapter that plugs into a dedicated port. The port is shown in a labelled image on the SonyStyle web site under "Specifications". The adapter is shown on the Sony Japan site.

With respect to Vista versus XP, I believe Microsoft currently only allows XP to be sold on computers with displays no greater than 1024x600 and 1GB of RAM.

Edited by - nomo on 01/08/2009 11:21:04
Go to Top of Page

nomo
Average Member

812 Posts

Posted - 01/08/2009 :  10:55:03  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by NigelS

I like the up coming HP Mini 2140 options in that regard: 10.1-inch diagonal LED display with 16:9 aspect ratio available in either standard-definition (1,024 x 576) or high-definition (1,366 x 768) resolutions: http://www.hp.com/hpinfo/newsroom/press/2009/090106xb.html
The HP 2140 specs look pretty good. I'm in the minority, but I'd gladly pay a little more for a better processor, though.

Go to Top of Page

nomo
Average Member

812 Posts

Posted - 01/08/2009 :  11:04:46  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
The Sony P-Series is listed on the Dynamism web site with 1.33, 1.60, and 1.86 GHz Atom processors.
Go to Top of Page

oion
Advanced Member

USA
2231 Posts

Posted - 01/08/2009 :  11:44:27  Show Profile  Visit oion's Homepage  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by NigelS

My my don't we all enjoy looking down on everything when we're someplace 'up'... (Although it's fun to belong to a trend 5 years before everyone else though, I must say...;) In any case don't run down the Picturebook! It was Sony taking leadership and chances with Crusoe, which I admired them a great deal for. They sold a lot of those things, and it would have been my first computer if LeoG hadn't turned me towards the Light.



Yes, that's part of the irony for me. Transmeta had a real hand in promoting low-power processing for ultraportables, Sony clearly helped that budding technology in the first place, and now we've come full circle with an Intel Picturebook II. Or something like that. I remember seeing a Picturebook back in the day when a coworker got one brand new. Let's just say our corner of the office didn't get much done for an hour or two as we fought each other to play with it.

quote:
Originally posted by tmt

Heck with Windows altogether, somehow it doesn't make sense on this device. This isn't a
laptop at all. It's a special purpose device, for what special purpose I have no clue.

Tom.



A glorified PDA? Super-cellphone? I believe in Japan, cell phones are used more for texting and email than actual calling (I seem to remember seeing some kind of statistic, anyway). For firing off the emails, I suppose it would be fine but somewhat overkill. As for targeting women... I hate how the industry likes painting something pink while half the time downgrading hardware and then says "Look, it's for wimmenz!"

But anyway, like I said when taking the VGA connection into account, I could see it as a mobile between work and home if you have a set of peripherals in each place. Hook it up to an actual, usable monitor and keyboard, and it would probably work fine. Portable hard drive with an emergency screen and internet connection--obviously, it doesn't have enough power to replace a desktop with gaming/developing/video editing capabilities, but if all you're doing is document storage and word processing on top of net surfing, I guess it's okay.

As a more random side note, I think my P-2040 is built better than my P-7230. The keyboard feels cheaper on the 7k and the upper left side actually squeaks when I press keys up there. Anyway. I couldn't play with the keyboard on the netbook I saw at Target because they had a slab of plastic covering it, but I'm sure it'd feel cheap too.

quote:
Originally posted by nomo

quote:
Originally posted by mr1

I see no VGA out port! Why Vista instead of XP?
It comes with a display/LAN adapter that plugs into a dedicated port. ...

With respect to Vista versus XP, I believe Microsoft currently only allows XP to be sold on computers with displays no greater than 1024x600 and 1GB of RAM.



Maybe in the netbook market, but Dell still sells both laptop and desktop systems with WinXP due to major consumer backlash when Microsoft/Dell made their first Vista announcement. It's a kick in the teeth that it costs about $100 more for the downgrade, though (technically you get XP installed and both XP and Vista on discs, I suppose). At least this netbook thing is helping Linux. Hmm, I wonder how Panasonic is doing... Oh, look! OQO is still alive and just released a UMPC with a OLED touch screen.

Sorry, getting off track there.
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 14  Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page | Next Page
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
LeoG.net Ultra-Portables Forum © Copyright LeoG.net 2001-2010 Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.3 seconds. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.07